W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-oilgaschem@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Request Re Editing Charter

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:54:27 -0600
Cc: public-oilgaschem@w3.org
Message-Id: <B2E6CE8C-159C-4DC1-806D-1775DF0B2ED4@w3.org>
To: Roger Cutler <rogercutler@gmail.com>

On 6 Dec 2011, at 4:26 PM, Roger Cutler wrote:

> I'm not clear what your initial comment about the history is intended for.  Do you want it explicitly referenced in the charter?  Or are you just pointing it out to me?  I know it's there, but to be honest I find it difficult to navigate the links in the history and understand what I'm seeing.  No doubt my skills will improve.

I was pointing it out to you and others. You mentioned history in your email but (1) it was further down and (2) no URI. So I wanted to give the URI for all to check it out.

I agree that reading diffs is not always fun and so it's friendly to summarize changes.

Ian

> 
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> On 6 Dec 2011, at 2:59 PM, Roger Cutler wrote:
> 
> > Just to help me keep track of what's going on and to avoid getting into an unintentional do-undo back and forth -- if you edit the draft charter could you please email me and give me a hint what you did?
> 
> Hi Roger,
> 
> I want to point out up top (you mention it below) the editing history:
>  http://www.w3.org/community/oilgaschem/wiki/index.php?title=Oil,_Gas_and_Chemicals_Business_Group_Charter&action=history
> 
> > Ian -- I think that you took out the voting and patent sections because there are no requirements, right?
> 
> Right:
> 
> 1) The proc doc voting requirements don't apply to BGs.
> 2) The patent requirements are covered by the CLA and FSA; you could link to them but I thought it was unnecessary.
> 
> > It does seem to me, however, that it might be a good idea to discuss the IP framework for Community and Business Groups anyway, as an informational thing.
> 
> No problem with that.
> 
> > I have in mind pointing to the IP page for Community groups and perhaps including some "user friendly" approximate discussion along the lines that you once sent me.  Sound OK?
> 
> I would avoid paraphrasing the policy. You could just say something vanilla like "Contributions are made under Community and Business Group agreements" with a link to the agreements.
> 
> [Meanwhile, I am working on a summary of the policy (not yet ready).]
> 
> Ian
> 
> >
> > Jennifer -- I find the history tracking of the Wiki confusing and I can't figure out what you did.  Not much, as far as I can tell -- unless I am confusing what you did with what Ian did.  Did you sort of complete what he started?
> >
> > I am not trying to discourage anyone from adding content or modifying.
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 22:54:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 December 2011 22:54:37 GMT