RE: RightsML in PROF

Hi all,

I’ve used Renato’s ODRL Profile template -  <https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/core-profile/odrl-profile-template.ttl> https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/core-profile/odrl-profile-template.ttl - for the ODRL profile of IPTC’s RightsML 2.0.

Its draft 01 of resides at https://www.iptc.org/std-dev/RightsML/2.0/odrl-profile-RightsML_2.0-draft01.ttl

 

Working on that raised a few questions and comments:

* The resources of the ODRL Core profile are blank nodes, while the resources for another ODRL profile are in a corresponding namespace. Both is ok?
* I suggest to use dct:issued with all profile resources – e.g. in spec documents typos could be fixed and this results in a later issue date than the vocabulary
* A big issue is the URI of an ODRL profile and versions of the profile: can a PROF profile only have single resource with the e.g. role:specification, or multiple with different hasArtifact URLs and different versions (versionInfo). 
Or is it required, also by ODRL considerations, to have a specific URI for each version of a profile – in this case we would need a new URI for the next version of ODRL Core.
* Finally: an ODRL profile has this document defining it and this document may be published as web resource. But how to let people know about it – an ODRL Policy has only the ODRL profile URI. Should this document be responded when requesting the ODRL Profile URI if it is a URL?

 

I suggest to have a quick look into this draft at the ODRL call on Monday, 6 May.

 

Thanks,

Michael

 

From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 3:11 PM
To: Michael Steidl (NIT) <mwsteidl@newsit.biz>
Cc: Nicholas.Car@csiro.au; Jaroslav Pullmann <jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>; andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu; Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Subject: Re: RightsML in PROF

 

Sure, added 2.2

 





On 17 Apr 2019, at 22:51, Michael Steidl (NIT) <mwsteidl@newsit.biz <mailto:mwsteidl@newsit.biz> > wrote:

 

Ok, a good starting point.

 

This should be considered: versioning of profiles. 

 <http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/core> http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/core is "The ODRL Core Profile" – in fact “The ODRL 2.2 Core Profile”. I guess a next version of ODRL (2.3 or 3.0) will define additional Things and therefore “The ODRL 2.3 Core Profile” will be different from the “The ODRL 2.2 Core Profile”. Should this be expressed by different URIs of the profile?

 

(I know, IPTC has no planned versioning of RightsML Profile URIs …)

 

Best,

Michael

 

From: Renato Iannella < <mailto:r@iannel.la> r@iannel.la> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:25 PM
To: Michael Steidl (NIT) < <mailto:mwsteidl@newsit.biz> mwsteidl@newsit.biz>;  <mailto:Nicholas.Car@csiro.au> Nicholas.Car@csiro.au
Cc: Jaroslav Pullmann < <mailto:jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de> jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>;  <mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu; Rob Atkinson < <mailto:rob@metalinkage.com.au> rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Subject: Re: RightML in PROF

 

 






On 17 Apr 2019, at 22:15, Michael Steidl (NIT) < <mailto:mwsteidl@newsit.biz> mwsteidl@newsit.biz> wrote:

 

Is this what you, Renato, meant with “flesh it out”?

 

I created a (draft) template for describing ODRL Profiles.

 

See here:  <https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/core-profile/odrl-profile-template.ttl> https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/core-profile/odrl-profile-template.ttl

 

Renato