- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:15:49 +1000
- To: Agnese Farinelli <agnese.farinelli@studenti.unimi.it>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
> On 24 Apr 2015, at 2:30 am, Agnese Farinelli <agnese.farinelli@studenti.unimi.it> wrote: > > We choosed to use ODRL version 1.1 instead of ODRL version 2.1 because we needed to work on a standard and, when we started our study, ODRL 1.1 was already a W3C Standard instead of ODRL version 2.1 (please correct us if we were in error). > Furthermore ODRL 1.1 is, currently, the best tool for the rights licences's definition, according to our needs. The ODRL specifications are technically not “W3C Standards” in the sense of “W3C Recommendations”. ODRL V1.1 was published as a W3C Note (as a member submission). ODRL 2.x are “W3C Community Group” reports - but we can call these “Specifications”. You can use either versions for your work - both should be capable for rights policies. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 12:16:21 UTC