Re: Feedback on the ODRL Ontology draft spec

Dear all,

I have no major comments and agree with all the changes

Víctor

El 26/11/2014 12:42, Renato Iannella escribió:
> These editorial comments are primarily aimed at aligning the ODRL 
> Ontology spec with the Common Vocabulary spec.
>
> 1 - Update title to "ODRL Version 2.1 Ontology"
>
> 2 - The "Offer", "Agreement", and "Offer and next Policy" scenario 
> examples need to update the pay duty to compensate and use a 
> constraint for the payAmount (not an asset)
>
> 3 - The "Multiple assets" scenario example needs to define 
> x:collection as a o:relation sub-property
>
> 4 - The "event" property also defines a specific value ("playUsage") - 
> need to add this
>
> 5 - All of the Actions need their definitions to be updated 
> (copy/paste from the Common Vocab document) as we have updated all the 
> definitions (from "grantUse" right up to "watermark")
>
> 6 - "aggregate", "annotate", and "anonymize" have Broader Term "use"
>
> 7 - deprecate "appendTo", "lease", "lend", "preview", "secondaryUse", 
> and "writeTo"
>
> 8 - deprecate "copy" and recommend to use "reproduce"
>
> 9 - "display" is not equivalent to "execute" (and vice-versa)
>
> 10 - deprecate "export" and recommend to use "transform"
>
> 11 - deprecate "license" and recommend to use "grantUse"
>
> 12 - "modify" is not equivalent to "derive" (and vice-versa)
>
> 13 - deprecate "pay" and recommend to use "compensate"
>
> 14 - "play" is not equivalent to "present" - "present" is a Broader Term
>
> 15 - "present" - move "play" from equivalent to narrower term
>
> 16 - add "transfer" and "use” actions (these need to be explicitly 
> defined in the Common Vocab as well)
>
>
> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
>