W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-odrl@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Party: Assignee=everyone

From: Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:52:40 +0000
To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
CC: "<public-odrl@w3.org>" <public-odrl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F2B39CC3-D4AC-4466-B76D-25AE09A223CE@bbc.co.uk>

On  2013-Sep-19, at 13:38, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote:

> 
> On 18 Sep 2013, at 01:42, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> This sounds like something perhaps could be added to the vocabulary to indicate the conceptual Party representing 'everyone' and which can be used as a @uid wherever that's needed?
> 
> We could...what would it look like?...and are there other "fixed" ids of interest?

In the RDF variant, we'd express it as a named individual, something like

:everyone a :All ;
	rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
	vs:term_status "testing" ;
	rdfs:label "Everyone"@en ;
	rdfs:comment "This is a pre-defined party which can be used when explicitly referring to the set of all possible parties"@en .

I'm not sure how it works in the XSD, I'm even less of an expert there :)

I'm not sure about fixed IDs for parties, once we've done one adding others should be technically easy if there's consensus. 

M.

-- 
Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and 
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in 
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the 
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender 
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails 
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to 
this.
-----------------------------

attached mail follows:



On  2013-Sep-19, at 13:38, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote:

> 
> On 18 Sep 2013, at 01:42, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> This sounds like something perhaps could be added to the vocabulary to indicate the conceptual Party representing 'everyone' and which can be used as a @uid wherever that's needed?
> 
> We could...what would it look like?...and are there other "fixed" ids of interest?

In the RDF variant, we'd express it as a named individual, something like

:everyone a :All ;
	rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
	vs:term_status "testing" ;
	rdfs:label "Everyone"@en ;
	rdfs:comment "This is a pre-defined party which can be used when explicitly referring to the set of all possible parties"@en .

I'm not sure how it works in the XSD, I'm even less of an expert there :)

I'm not sure about fixed IDs for parties, once we've done one adding others should be technically easy if there's consensus. 

M.

-- 
Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E


Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 12:53:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:46 UTC