W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-odrl@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Party: Assignee=everyone

From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:37:43 +1000
Cc: <public-odrl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2418C975-B614-4047-A69E-342E0B8404DD@semanticidentity.com>
To: dave.compton@thomsonreuters.com

On 18 Sep 2013, at 01:24, dave.compton@thomsonreuters.com wrote:

> Scenario: The EPA {assigner} allows anyone {assignee} to distribute {action} a picture {target-asset} in Germany {constraint}.
> So as an Offer this then becomes:

Yes, that looks good.

> For an agreement: If an assignee (with @uid) is added, is scope=all explicitly needed? Or does the absence of party /@scope implicitly mean ‘all people in the context of the party defined by party /@uid’?


In general we try to be explicit in the encodings...so if you mean "all" then add a scope.

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 12:38:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:46 UTC