Re: Party: Assignee=everyone

On 18 Sep 2013, at 01:24, dave.compton@thomsonreuters.com wrote:

> Scenario: The EPA {assigner} allows anyone {assignee} to distribute {action} a picture {target-asset} in Germany {constraint}.
> So as an Offer this then becomes:

Yes, that looks good.

> For an agreement: If an assignee (with @uid) is added, is scope=all explicitly needed? Or does the absence of party /@scope implicitly mean ‘all people in the context of the party defined by party /@uid’?


In general we try to be explicit in the encodings...so if you mean "all" then add a scope.

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206