Re: odrl-ISSUE-17: sameAs issue with Action vocabulary (forwarded)

I think perhaps, rather than sameAs (which I can accommodate in the next rev of the docs, incidentally — it was an oversight on my part that they’re not represented in the human-readable version), that we use deprecatedBy and pick one of the two where there are currently equivalent identifiers?

M.

On  2013-Nov-15, at 14:20, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org> wrote:

> I propose to discuss the option of no duplicate identifiers first (but to introduce labels and to allow synonyms).
> Only if this is turned down we have to present the duplicates (better).
>
> Michael
>
> From: Renato Iannella [mailto:ri@semanticidentity.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:14 PM
> To: ODRL Community Group
> Subject: Re: odrl-ISSUE-17: sameAs issue with Action vocabulary (forwarded)
>
>
> Hi Michael...for clarification.....
>
> Are you proposing that ODRL should not have "duplicate" concept identifiers?
> (ie a semantic issue)
> Or that we need to present our concepts better/nicer in our specs?
> (ie a presentation issue)
>
> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
> Semantic Identity
> http://semanticidentity.com
> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206


--
Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 16:08:46 UTC