Re: ODRL target/Dublin Core license/rights

I fully agree with this view.

But I would like to highlight that the direction of the relation is not 
a minor issue. Shall we explicitly define the inverse of odrl:target?

Regards,
Víctor


El 29/07/2013 9:29, Mo McRoberts escribió:
> i.e., where the ODRL policy fits the definition of a 'Rights document' or a 'License document' as defined by Dublin Core (and we should probably look at inserting the appropriate superclass relationships into the model accordingly), then consider it valid to use dct:rights or dct:license. In other situations, in the absence of any other obvious predicate with that directionality, one must use odrl:target instead.


-- 
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 91336 3672
Skype: vroddon3

Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 08:37:03 UTC