Re: Namespace of ODRL

On 26 Jul 2013, at 23:33, "Myles, Stuart" <SMyles@ap.org> wrote:

> Actually, this is a great illustration of my concern about having multiple namespaces. If Renato can make a slip (and nobody really notices it) how likely is that people who crafting ODRL statements in the wild will take the trouble of figuring out the correct namespace to use in each piece?

There are advantages to one namespace with no hierarchy (I think schema.org follows this pattern).

What do others think???

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 07:35:45 UTC