- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:26:35 +1000
- To: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
On 12 Apr 2013, at 18:26, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > There is an open question as to whether the actions (in particular) would be better modelled as a SKOS classification scheme than a set of abstract things… I think on balance I'm leaning towards “yes” (particularly as a classification scheme allows skos:broader and skos:narrower-type relationships). I don't feel hugely strongly on it, but more than happy to make the change if there's anything approaching a consensus that it'd be an improvement! I agree, SKOS would improve semantic relationships, but would also come at a cost of needing to also understand SKOS (versus native RDF/OWL that Protege and other tools happily reason with..) Perhaps we should learn to crawl before walking ;-) Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 12:27:07 UTC