W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-odrl@w3.org > July 2012

RE: odrl-ISSUE-10: How to identify a group of assets [ODRL Version 2.0 Core Model (Public)]

From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:18:20 +0200
To: "ODRL Community Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005101cd5b4f$e76bad30$b6430790$@iptc.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Renato Iannella [mailto:ri@semanticidentity.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 7:07 AM
> To: Michael Steidl (IPTC)
> Subject: Re: odrl-ISSUE-10: How to identify a group of assets [ODRL
> 2.0 Core Model (Public)]
> On 5 Jul 2012, at 23:00, Michael Steidl (IPTC) wrote:
> > And an open issue is: does the assigner has the right to define which
> > wildcard syntax is used for a @uid value.
> If they use URNs (as an example), then the "Namespace" owner can define
> the semantics after the ":"
> In your URN spec: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3937
> If I have this URN: urn:iptc:std:NewsML:1.1:spec will that refer to *all
> tangible resources" related to the NewsML1.1 spec?

This iptc URN namespace is made only for specification documents.
News items based on the IPTC standards NewsML 1 or NewsML-G2 may use the
"newsml" URN namespace for identifiers - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3085

In this case a wildcard variant like
"urn:newsml:newsagency.com:20120101:news201206*" could express that all news
items issued by the News Agency with an identifier matching this wildcard
are covered by this policy.

But we have to be careful not to mix this up with ISSUE-11 which requests to
let assets point at a corresponding policy. That's why I proposed to add
this new "refTarget" asset/policy relationship for this ISSUE-11 use case,
while this "group of assets" policy could use the usual "target"


> Cheers...
> Renato Iannella
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 08:18:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:45 UTC