W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-nfc@w3.org > May 2012

Re: draft charter for a W3C NFC working group - gemalto comments

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:21:38 +0000
To: "'dsr@w3.org'" <dsr@w3.org>
CC: "'Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com'" <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, "'public-nfc@w3.org'" <public-nfc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C350FEB9763@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>
I wasn't calling for specific wording. I was referencing the dialog about Web Intents being a reason that certain functional capabilities could be left out of scope in the charter. I think that determination is preliminary. So in general I am supporting what Virginie said and what I called for earlier in the thread.
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T 

----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Raggett [mailto:dsr@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 08:17 AM
Cc: 'Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com' <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>; 'public-nfc@w3.org' <public-nfc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: draft charter for a W3C NFC working group - gemalto comments

Hi Bryan,

On 11/05/12 15:45, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:

> These type of technical dialogs and solutions should be addressed by
> the members of a WG, so the charter should accommodate that. If Web
> Intents is useful here that is an option but should not affect the
> charter scope, as whether it is an adequate option may require more
> discussion than should take place at this stage.

Web intents doesn't appear in the current draft, so I am not sure what
changes to the wording you are thinking of.

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 21:22:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:43:36 UTC