Re: DOM NamedStorage Interface Proposal

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a lot more value in defining an async store (à la localForage[1])
> and making sure it doesn't sport these kind of issues than in proposing
> fixes to a sync store vendors no longer want to spend resources on.
>
> [1]: http://mozilla.github.io/localForage/

Yeah, a simple promise-based API that can use IndexedDB as backend is
what we want I think. No more localStorage-based designs.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 18:48:58 UTC