Re: Merged a lot

On Jan 14, 2013 11:09 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Clint,
> Stupid question, but my grunt doesn't like "GruntFile.js" … it's looking
for 'grunt.js' so I get an grunt.js file not found error.
>
> Am I out of date or something?
>
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
> > Yeas that is just what I was suggesting.
> > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com (http://hitchjs.com)
> > On Jan 14, 2013 10:48 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:
clint.hill@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > It was a git pull – so just an update.
> > >
> > > I had to make modifications to both grunt-contrib-qunit and
grunt-contrib-uglify, due to the Grunt API changes.
> > >
> > > As a stopgap I'm going to commit node_modules. This way we all have
the same stuff. Once Grunt becomes stabilized we can drop them from the
tree.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com (mailto:bkardell@gmail.com)>
> > > Date: Monday, January 14, 2013 8:36 AM
> > > To: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)>
> > > Cc: "public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)" <
public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > Subject: Re: Merged a lot
> > >
> > > Did it get you node_modules or are you using what I sent you? In
other words, did you try a fresh one or just an update?
> > > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com (http://hitchjs.com)
> > > On Jan 14, 2013 10:26 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:
clint.hill@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > I pulled the latest this morning and the build was just fine.
> > > >
> > > > From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com (mailto:bkardell@gmail.com)>
> > > > Date: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:09 PM
> > > > To: "public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)" <
public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > > Subject: Merged a lot
> > > > Resent-From: <public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > > Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:10:05 +0000
> > > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I've merged Marco's pull request... Despite the fact that all of
the issues say "implement" which Marcos clearly has accomplished, I didn't
follow through and close them because a couple of them had open
comments/notes... Francois, can you just quickly take a look through the
ones where Marcos had a question and maybe determine if you would like to
make note of it, open a new issue on it or whatever? I don't want to lose
the open questions...
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to close these out and get some test suite running them
thatso that we can have the edge/fringe sort of debates and have something
we can safely rework if necessary... The current tests only check that an
item exists and, well - the test harnessing itself seems broken to me.
> > > >
> > > > To that end: can someone verify that the build is borked? I was
unable to run it ... jshint which complains for me on the webidl file
iteself, not anything recently added because of the Function constructor
and use of __proto__...
> > > >
> > > > I was able to put them into a local server and manually make the
adjustments/copies that the build work and things worked fine though...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com (http://hitchjs.com/)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
It isn't a stupid question at all - as I said, they are reworking grunt.
Your version was the latest until just a few days ago and there are
significant breaking changes including this one.

Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com