- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:13:54 +0000
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: public-nextweb@w3.org
On Monday, November 12, 2012 at 6:09 PM, François REMY wrote: > | Browser vendors are not into it… they know about it, > | but they are really resistant. > > This has been our experience as well, predictably. I think the main issue is > that they don't see why it's a benefit for *them*. So, here is the discussion from 2011: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/01-webapps-minutes.html#item11 "... the reality is that today, webidl doesn't specify something "reasonable" that could be implemented [sic] yourself in JS" There is a lot of gold in there. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 18:14:21 UTC