Re: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Publishing Working Group Charter'

> On 8 May 2017, at 14:19, <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com> <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ivan - looks OK to me. I assume the issue of identifying assets within a publication/package is already covered elsewhere.

It is a topic of discussion with regards to the manifests, and there is a requirement on records that the assets should be listed somewhere (as it is the case for EPUB, for example)

Thanks Ben!

Ivan

> 
> Ben
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>> Sent: 08 May 2017 10:30
>> To: Bailey, Bob (TR Technology & Ops); Whittam Smith, Benedict (TR Technology
>> & Ops)
>> Cc: public-new-work@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Publishing Working Group
>> Charter'
>> 
>> Bob, Ben,
>> 
>> I have also added a pull request[1] that adds references to the two ODRL
>> documents. Are they o.k. for you?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/66
>>> On 27 Apr 2017, at 17:13, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Bob, Ben
>>> 
>>> thanks for your vote. A question on your comment:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Additional comments about the proposal:
>>>> I suggest adding POE (Permissions & Obligations Expression) WG to the
>>>> list of working groups to be coordinated with.
>>>> 
>>>> My colleague, Ben Whittam-Smith (who is co-chair of POE-WG) says:
>>>> 
>>>> "What a publisher using POE needs [in order] to attach their licenses to
>>>> the assets within a publication is a way to identify – and probably
>>>> additionally segment – those assets within the publication.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope that this is within scope of the PUBL-WG. If so, then some liaison
>>>> would be useful."
>>> 
>>> Although one does not exclude the other, I wonder whether it is not more
>> appropriate to add the ODRL model (or vocab?) document as an official input
>> document to the charter for the reasons you cite. (And, to be clear, I would
>> certainly be in favour doing that.) Although, of course, one does not exclude
>> the other, a liaison may not be all that meaningful because the POE Working
>> group may essentially complete its technical development and will be close to
>> completion by the time the Publishing Working Group will get up to speed.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely
>>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704