[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Previous HTML and XHTML are Obsolete Recommendations'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Call for Review:
Previous HTML and XHTML are Obsolete Recommendations' (Advisory
Com‌mit‌te‌e) for Katie Haritos-Shea.

> 
> ---------------------------------
> Decision for the Previous HTML and XHTML Specifications
> ----
> Regarding the proposal to obsolete these Recommendations, my
> organization:
> 
> 

 * ( ) supports republishing all these Recommendations as Obsolete
Recommendations.
 * (x) only supports those selected Recommendations listed in the box below
as Obsolete Recommendations for the reasons included below [Formal
Objection to the others becoming Obsolete Recommendations].
 * ( ) objects to the whole proposal, does not support to republish any of
these Recommendations as Obsolete Recommendations for the reasons included
below [Formal Objection].
These are the Recommendations my organization supports as Obsolete
Recommendations, for the following reasons: 
Knowbility does NOT agree that HTML 5.0 shall be identified as an "Obsolete
Recommendation" at this point in time. We would like to see 'Superseded'
only in the SoTD and elsewhere, until such time that 5.1 has more legs and
is as stable as 5.0. 

HTML 3.2 
 HTML 4.0 
 HTML 4.0 
 HTML 4.01 
 
 XHTML™ Basic
 XHTML™ 1.0: 
 Modularization of XHTML™, 
 XHTML™ 1.1 
 XHTML™ 1.0 
 XHTML-Print
 XHTML™ Basic 1.1
 XHTML™ Modularization 1.1
 XHTML™ Basic 1.1 
 XHTML™ Modularization 1.1
 XHTML-Print XHTML™ 1.1

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Other Comments
> ----
> Please add here any other comments you have.
> 
> 
Comments: 
Allowing for ONLY approval or a Formal Objection in this vote is in poor
form. We do object to HTML 5 being identified as Obsolete, but we wouldn't
have wanted to Formally Object if given the opportunity to do so.

Knowbility does NOT agree that HTML 5.0 shall be identified as an "Obsolete
Recommendation" at this point in time. We would like to see 'Superseded'
only in the SoTD and elsewhere, until such time that 5.1 has more legs and
is as stable as 5.0. 

> 
> These answers were last modified on 27 August 2017 at 13:45:16 U.T.C.
> by Katie Haritos-Shea
> 
Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101147/specs-obs-2017-08/ until 2017-09-07.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Sunday, 27 August 2017 13:47:59 UTC