Re: [widgets] Request for a CFC about Widget URI and Updates

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:27:19 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>> On 28 Feb 2012, at 15:38, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:42 +0100, Scott Wilson

>> > > We've implemented Updates (its lurking in Wookie, but  
>> undocumented), but it will be a while before I imagine see it being  
>> used in anger in a way that would contribute to pushing the spec  
>> towards Recc.
>> >
>> > We have implemented and use updates, and fix bugs in anger if we find  
>> them. I think there might be enough to take it to Rec, and I think that  
>> could be a good idea...
>>
>> I'm happy to upload our test results to the implementation report -  
>> that would be a start in terms of seeing where we've got to.

> That would indeed be a great start. Charles, do you think maybe someone  
> at Opera could do the same?

Yep. It might take a few days, but I should be able to do that.

> It was Opera's QA that created the tests (Harig), so he can probably  
> just tell you what passes/fails. If you let me know what fails, I can do  
> the rest… including doing another pass at the spec if need be. If there  
> are no outstanding issues, we can move it to CR -> PR -> REC fairly  
> quickly.

OK.

Cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:51:37 UTC