Hi, The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group discussed last week [1] whether or not to advertise the use of GZIP-encoding as being a good practice to serve content to mobile devices. The crux of the question is to find the right balance between: * the time saved by having less data transmitted on mobile networks (with sometimes a limited bandwidth) * the time taken to decompress the resulting resource on mobile phones (with a limited CPU) I've started to write a test that tries to assess these two aspects: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/gzip-mobile/ What the test does: * as soon as the server receives the request for the first step of the test, it records a log point in a database * when the client finishes to parse the 56K page (full of comments, mostly), it hits a remote javascript (called from <script> at the end of the document) * when the server receives the request for the script, it logs a new point in the database * then the same sequence of operations is made for roughly the same content, but sent g-zipped It gathers results as follows: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/gzip-mobile/results I'm interested to hear whether you guys think this is a valid approach or not, how to possibly improve it or make it more complete. Thanks for any feedback, Dom 1. http://www.w3.org/2008/06/17-bpwg-minutes#item_conservativeReceived on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 13:08:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 June 2008 13:08:58 GMT