- From: Wilhelm Joys Andersen <wilhelmja@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:07:42 +0100
- To: public-mwts@w3.org
Hi, Thanks a lot for your feedback. I have added most of your tests to the demo: http://people.opera.com/wilhelmja/mwts/demo.html * Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: | Not too sure about that one... I'm not sure a full imperative graphics | API is so well-fitted for mobile devices (due to the CPU/battery penalty | it implies); but maybe that's a concern that shouldn't impact the design | of the test. If we want to test to which extent any browser supports the full web, we should probably include this. |> - XML | | What do you have in mind with that? Load a document with an XML MIME-type. Not all browsers support this. |> - contenteditable | | Not too sure about that one - with the same worry as earlier, i.e. its | fitness on mobile devices. The current generation of mobile browsers do not support this, but I believe that will change. Editing raw HTML when updating their blog is not something most users want to do, regardless of what kind of device they are using. | I think we should not have WML in the mix; I don't think WML is looking | forward, but rather backward. Good point. | [...] | Here is a test for Unicode support, although I'm not really sure this is | what you had in mind: I'm not entirely sure myself. (c: | [...] | I'm using the object tag, but maybe we should target the video tag | instead? although again, the current standardization status of HTML 5 | makes it hard to decide if targeting it might not be too premature. I believe we should wait with this. There is no consensus on the baseline format for the <video> element. -- Wilhelm Joys Andersen Core QA, Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:08:04 UTC