W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mw4d@w3.org > January 2010

RE: new charter version

From: Olla, Phillip <polla@madonna.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:41:12 -0500
Message-ID: <B29B2EA64E86BC4FB243B7141CAE9C6F016AF0E5@exch1srvr.madonna.edu>
To: "Chevrollier, N.G. (Nicolas)" <nicolas.chevrollier@tno.nl>, "adesina iluyemi" <adeiluyemi@gmail.com>, "Renjish Kumar" <renjish.kumar@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stephane Boyera" <boyera@w3.org>, <public-mw4d@w3.org>
Hi 
 
I have read the new charter and I agree with the approach. 
 
Is there a reason we are using the term 'Notes'. I don't believe the word notes goes far enough to describe what we intend to produce for each of the section.  This is just a thought, if there is a compelling reason why we want to adopt this term, then please ignore this comment.
 
Regards
 
Phillip
 
 
 
Dr Phillip Olla
Endowed Phillips Chair of Management
School of Business
Madonna University
36600 Schoolcraft rd
Livonia
48150

________________________________

From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org on behalf of Chevrollier, N.G. (Nicolas)
Sent: Tue 1/26/2010 08:27 AM
To: adesina iluyemi; Renjish Kumar
Cc: Stephane Boyera; public-mw4d@w3.org
Subject: RE: new charter version



Hi all,

Just to make sure I understand:
- we will work domain based and collect information on the different
topics (adoption, business model, ...)
- we will present the notes topic based (maybe 1 sub-section on what is
general and 1 sub-section on each domain)

If that is the case, I would rather go for a presentation per domain as
well and a general note about generalization.

But this is only a matter on how we organize the note. In any case we
have to start collecting per domain.

Best,

Nicolas


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of adesina iluyemi
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:02 PM
> To: Renjish Kumar
> Cc: Stephane Boyera; public-mw4d@w3.org
> Subject: Re: new charter version
>
> I support these suggestions of Interest Groups. 3, 4, 5, specifically
> interests me
>
> Adesina
>
> On 19/01/2010, Renjish Kumar <renjish.kumar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Stephane, All,
> >
> > The charter doc has captured different dimensions of MW4D,
> > namely Application domains, Tools, Impact Analysis, Business Models
and
> > Service Adoption Methodologies quite well.  Thanks.
> >
> > May I also suggest that we include a statement somewhere (perhaps in
the
> > Approach section?) in the doc emphasizing that the primary objective
is
> to
> > identify the "best practices" based on empirical evidences and not
to
> invent
> > new methodologies or models. The "Group note on MW4D tools
landscape"
> seems
> > like an exception here, so the question is whether we can do this in
the
> > stipulated time period of this group?
> >
> > Secondly, which Group note will include the following (mentioned in
the
> > Approach section):
> >
> > "Then, in a second phase, after having studied few domains, the
group
> will
> > identify cross-sector similarities, and potential generalizations
that
> could
> > provide solutions across different domains."
> >
> > Would this also be in the first Group note?
> >
> > The Group note descriptions cover the scope briefly quite well. To
make
> > their titles to reflect the scope accurately, I feel it will be
proper
> to
> > add the key word MW4D wherever appropriate. I mean the following:
> >
> >
> >    1. An Interest Group Note on Domain-Specific Challenges and
> > *MW4D*Solutions
> >    2. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D* Tools Landscape
> >    3. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D* Impact Analysis Methodologies
and
> >    Results
> >    4. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D* Business Models
> >    5. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D Service* Adoption
Methodologies
> >
> >
> >  More when we discuss the scope of each note in detail.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Renjish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> Following our discussions yesterday i updated the charter at
> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/MW4Dcharter2.html along the lines we
> discussed:
> >>
> >> *mentionned social networks in the work on tools
> >> *added a section 1.1 approach describing the bottom-up approach we
> >> discussed. Also mentionned it in the timeline section
> >> *added a section on adoptin methodologies and added a corresponding
> >> deliverable. Nicolas feel free to propose a better description
> >>
> >> Let me know if i missed something.
> >> All comments are welcome before teh end of this week so that i can
> start
> >> the process of validation next week
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Steph
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stephane Boyera         stephane@w3.org
> >> W3C                             +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08
> >> BP 93                           fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22
> >> F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
> >> France
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Adesina Iluyemi
> mHealth Innovator/Consultant
> SINSEPROD LLP, UK
> Sustainable eHealth/Telemedicine in Africa
> Centre for Healthcare Modelling & Informatics
> University of Portsmouth
> T: +44 (0)23 9284 6784
> M: +44 (0)79 5602 6010
> Skype:innovatoris
> W: http://www.linkedin.com/in/adesina1974

This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 16:41:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:07:11 UTC