I have been in the "location technology" business for over 30 years and note that those methods depending on centralized (hierarchic) methods, from the radio direction finders of World War II through the satellites commonly seen as "the solution" aren't ideal. The most widespread version of "where am I?" http://www.ski.org/Rehab/WCrandall/General/LOUGH1.htm is the system of "Talking Signs" which solve problems associated with "hard-wired" systems, i.e. signs aren't considered as "information" - it may say "Bleekman Brothers" but give no further news about the signed location. By "tagging" the environments with serially-numbered infra-red LEDs with discreet numbers (these discrete numbers are the basis of URIs peculiar to each "sign") associated on the Web with their precise location (IR is very directional!) the user can find her place in the world as well as navigate to other locations. Another advantage to a tagged environment is that it doesn't depend on satellite availability with the attendant problems associated with that system. Love. http://www.talkingsigns.com On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Mira Slavova <slavbreed@gmail.com> wrote: > > What do you think about location technologies > and their use? >Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 14:44:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:06 GMT