- From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <bathory@maltedmedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:38:47 -0400
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
On Thu, April 6, 2017 7:25 am, Joe Berkovitz wrote: > Please leave off trying to make the CWMN aspect of MNX into a generalized > representation for arbitrary music notation. It is not designed to work to > do that. I do not want to have more discussions about how to use the > current CWMN proposal to cover pieces that lie well outside of its range. > > Let me say again: a different strand of this group's work is going to > address the larger, broader range of music notation, and this should > include pieces like Riley's works, which which I'm familiar. It should also > include pieces *much further* from CWMN. > > I suggest we discuss this tomorrow in person and not belabor these points > on the list until then. Can we belabor? I'm not able to be there in person, and would like to hear such a discussion. (Perhaps you will be streaming? If so, where?) Thanks, Dennis
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 11:39:22 UTC