Re: [smufl] Add Stockhausen accidentals

I appreciate that, but I don't think the decision of whether or not to
 include them in SMuFL at all should be based on the technical 
limitations of the standard so much as practical experience in using 
these glyphs. 

Based on your prior experience, do you think it makes sense to include
 them in order to better accommodate multiple voices on opposite stems
 for example? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by knutnergaard
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/smufl/issues/51#issuecomment-212882288 using 
your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 11:56:50 UTC