- From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz <bathory@maltedmedia.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:54:49 -0400
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
On Wed, October 28, 2015 10:11 am, notenlektorat wrote: > @Dennis: what exactly do you expect a notation program to do with your 3D > score? It's a challenge more to imagination than practice, I think. Scores and notational practice continue to change in response to musical ideas, from graphical scores of the 1960s through animated and 3D notation today. First is the need for an adequate coding of the 60-plus years of scores that already include elements and approaches beyond what is effectively 19th century notation with 20th century "add ons". We've begun part of that discussion. Once those elements and approaches become part of the vocabulary (at least the vocabulary that interests this group), I'd think the representation of scores in 3D notation (among which my score is hardly unique) becomes relatively trivial. Just as 2D notation (as, say, *XML + style) allows reproduction of a score in various 2D formats (screen, paper, etc.), 3D notation (also as *XML + style) would allow reproduction of a score in 3D format (anaglyph, hologram, 3D printer, etc.). Dennis
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2015 14:55:16 UTC