Re: The MusicXML challenge and Chords

Yes. I was referring to the file Mogens sent. The ties are a little odd, but it's the lack of beams that is more problematic.

Either way, I think MusicXML must be able to show that LH rhythm in whatever right or wrong way suits the user. That is the important part to me. It doesn't matter if it's wrong, good music has been "wrong" on technical terms as long as such terms have existed. For the purposes of this conversation, I'm more concerned with the MusicXML spec than the other stuff. That was just an example.

DM




On Nov 4, 2015, 8:38 PM -0500, Mark Johnson<mjears@gmail.com>, wrote:
> Is it Mogens' tied notation you're saying is "wrong"? Chopin's original seems quite clear in terms of duration and voicing. I'm attaching an example with the voices moved around to avoid duration conflicts in the notation. But Chopin's has the advantage of also indicating (more or less) the division of notes between the hands. And on the piano obviously it's all pleasantly blurred by the pedal, so the actual keys need not be held to all of these durations. But his conflicting durations and double-stemmed notes also indicate relative stress for voicing purposes, and other even subtler things. (My example deliberately omits tempo, dynamics, phrase marks, and pedal indications, in order to focus on the note durations.)
> Mark Johnson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> David MacDonald<davidjohnmacdonald@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > I would say that the Raindrop notation is "wrong." If a student brought that into a composition lesson at my university, I would strongly urger him or her to change the rhythmic notation.