- From: Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 14:08:13 +0300
- To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- CC: Pēteris Ņikiforovs <peteris.nikiforovs@Tilde.lv>, Artūrs Vasiļevskis <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>, Tatiana Gornostay <tatiana.gornostay@tilde.lv>
Hi Dave, Thanks for the information. From our point, as far as I can tell (by quickly skimming through): 1) Terminology is OK 2) For Language Information what does the example represent? It is not clear to me how mtype="x-its" relates to xml:lang="en" (that is, the mapping is not clear to me here). Apart from that, I see that no changes have been made... 3) Elements Within Text is OK 4) Domain is OK, but ... when will the namespace be defined? And ... why are there multiple namespaces? its and itsx? Is there a reason why it is not enough to use just one? 5) Locale Filter is OK. Best regards, Mārcis ;o) -----Original Message----- From: Dave Lewis [mailto:dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 1:34 PM To: Mārcis Pinnis; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org Subject: Update to XLIFF mapping for terminology use case Hi Marcis, We've just finished a session in Bled where we've tried to address your comments on the XLIFF mapping. Could you take a quick look at: http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping to check if the ssues whihc you are concerned with are addressed. If you can get back quikly we can try and respond while the XLIFF heads are around the table here. cheers, Dave
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 11:08:44 UTC