Re: Issue-55 - XLIFF mapping -

Hi David,

Am 04.03.13 12:12, schrieb Dr. David Filip:
> Thanks Felix, it sounds reasonable, but can you explain how do we
> contribute to this namespace?

what do you mean by "contribute" to the namespace? I can easily update

[ This document describes the namespace of extensions to the 
Internationalization Tag Set (ITS) Version 1.0 
<http://www.w3.org/TR/its/> (April 2007 version). Internationalization 
Tag Set (ITS) Version 1.0 has been produced by the W3C I18N ITS Working 
Group <http://www.w3.org/International/its/>, and the extensions are 
being developed by the I18N ITS Interest Group 
<http://www.w3.org/International/its/ig/>. Note that the extensions of 
this namespace are not supposed to be stable, but are being discussed in 
the Interest Group. ]


To cover the MWL-LT WG as well - is that what you mean?

Since the namespace is not related to a W3C Recommendation track 
document it doesn't really matter, from the w3c process point of view.

Best,

Felix

>   Do we need to become ITS IG members to
> add elements/attributes?
> Thanks
> dF
>
> Dr. David Filip
> =======================
> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
> University of Limerick, Ireland
> telephone: +353-6120-2781
> cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
> facsimile: +353-6120-2734
> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
>> Hi Yves, David, all,
>>
>> I haven't yet checked W3C internally about the namespace hosting - butYves
>> solution sounds good to me. Would that work for everybody?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> Am 01.03.13 14:54, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>>
>>> Hi David, all,
>>>
>>> maybe there is no need for one after all.
>>>
>>> There is an "ITS Extension" namespace already
>>> (http://www.w3.org/2008/12/its-extensions)
>>>
>>> This has been used for several years to markup extensions to ITS after
>>> 1.0, trying to gather new features for 2.0.
>>> See for example:
>>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/IssuesAndProposedFeatures
>>>
>>> So far I had not thought about this namespace as a place to specify the
>>> "missing" parts for mapping to XLIFF and other formats, but thinking more
>>> about it there is no reason that could be used for this.
>>>
>>> As long as the different elements and attributes are clearly defined and
>>> have an explanation on where they should be used.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> -yves
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 6:38 AM
>>> To: Yves Savourel; Sean Mooney; Felix Sasaki; David Lewis
>>> Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Issue-55 - XLIFF mapping -
>>>
>>> Yves, I agree the UL hosting of the namespace is of course just a stop gap
>>> measure.
>>> We are happy and ready to hand over to W3C at any moment.
>>> @Felix, did you look into W3C hosting of the namespace? Did I miss it?
>>>
>>> Discussing it with Dave et al., we figured that other mappings might be in
>>> need of similar extensions, Dave has some RDF related examples on the wiki.
>>> So the idea is to have itsx: and call it "ITS Extensions" and use it for
>>> any extensions that are required for mapping into different vocabularies.
>>> Sean will circulate the URL and the initial xsd that we are going to use
>>> in Rome. The xsd will be placed onto GitHub, so that others can contribute
>>> to it until the namespace is taken over by W3C, and managed via a W3C
>>> process.
>>>
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>> dF
>>>
>>> Dr. David Filip
>>> =======================
>>> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
>>> University of Limerick, Ireland
>>> telephone: +353-6120-2781
>>> cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
>>> facsimile: +353-6120-2734
>>> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Dave, David, all,
>>>>
>>>> Last conference call I think David noted that UL was ready to host a
>>>> namespace URI for the extra namespace we need for the extra attributes
>>>> needed to cover the lack of direct mapping (the itsx namespace
>>>> described at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping)
>>>>
>>>> I think the real namespace should be hosted by either the W3C or by OASIS
>>>> and it needs to be set up soon. We don't want to start generating XLIFF
>>>> documents for production with a temporary namespace.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> -yves
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>