- From: Dr. David Filip <David.Filip@ul.ie>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:37:40 +0000
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, Sean Mooney <sean.mooney@ul.ie>, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Yves, I agree the UL hosting of the namespace is of course just a stop gap measure. We are happy and ready to hand over to W3C at any moment. @Felix, did you look into W3C hosting of the namespace? Did I miss it? Discussing it with Dave et al., we figured that other mappings might be in need of similar extensions, Dave has some RDF related examples on the wiki. So the idea is to have itsx: and call it "ITS Extensions" and use it for any extensions that are required for mapping into different vocabularies. Sean will circulate the URL and the initial xsd that we are going to use in Rome. The xsd will be placed onto GitHub, so that others can contribute to it until the namespace is taken over by W3C, and managed via a W3C process. Rgds dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, David, all, > > Last conference call I think David noted that UL was ready to host a namespace URI for the extra namespace we need for the extra attributes needed to cover the lack of direct mapping (the itsx namespace described at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping) > > I think the real namespace should be hosted by either the W3C or by OASIS and it needs to be set up soon. We don't want to start generating XLIFF documents for production with a temporary namespace. > > cheers, > -yves > > > >
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 13:38:50 UTC