W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week)

From: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:45:36 +0000
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: 'Arle Lommel' <Arle.Lommel@dfki.de>, 'Ankit Srivastava' <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, 'Clemens Weins' <Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com>, 'dave lewis' <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "''Pedro L. Díez Orzas''" <pedro.diez@linguaserve.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Message-ID: <OFE591A363.13A68D36-ON80257B1F.00407F8C-80257B1F.004099E0@vistatec.ie>
I think merged, longer usage scenarios would work better.

Phil.





From:   Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
To:     Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, 
Cc:     public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org, 'dave lewis' 
<dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, 'Clemens Weins' <Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com>, 
"''Pedro L. Díez Orzas''" <pedro.diez@linguaserve.com>, 'Phil Ritchie' 
<philr@vistatec.ie>, 'Ankit Srivastava' <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, 
'Arle Lommel' <Arle.Lommel@dfki.de>
Date:   26/02/2013 17:07
Subject:        Re: [All] review draft agenda, preparation call 1 March 
1-3 p.m. UTC (Friday this week)



Am 26.02.13 18:03, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>> These two
>> [
>> •  Pedro: ITS2.0 Implementation Experience in HTML5 with the
>> SpanishTax Agency (WP3, WP4)
>> •  Hans v. Freyberg: Standardization for the Multilingual
>> Web: A Driver of Business Opportunities (WP3)]
>>
>> Are focusing on "business value". I thought that your presentation and
>> Phil might do the same ... but I'm not sure if that would work for you?
>> Thoughts from you, Phil or others?
> Thanks for the pointer Felix.
>
> I guess I'm trying to get a sense of the difference between the demos in 
the morning and those talks in the afternoon. In both cases they seem to 
be strictly based on the use cases.
>
> So those afternoon presentations would be more an outline of the 
business aspects of the use cases? Aren't we risking to repeat ourselves a 
bit between the morning and afternoon session?
>
> Would it make sense to have longer session for each, that would include 
the business part and then the demo part as an illustration, and have a 
few the morning and a few the afternoon? That is instead of having case A 
demo, case B demo, etc. on the morning and then case A business, case B 
business in the afternoon, to have: case A business + demo in the morning 
and case B business + demo in the afternoon.
>
> (I'm just thinking aloud... not that we should change anything).

This is a good thought, Yves. I hadn't the repition aspect in mind. 
Let's see what others think - if there is no disagreement I'd then merge 
the agenda in just "usage scenario" presentations.

Best,

Felix
> -yves
>




************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail.

www.vistatec.com
************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 11:46:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:08 UTC