W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [All] high level use cases doc and wiki link

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:52:43 +0100
Message-ID: <5126891B.4010109@w3.org>
To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Hi Yves,

I agree. At Pablo: I can understand your argument about "leave the dead 
alone". But in terms "IG will live longer", Yves is right: not every 
organisation in this group will continue to stay in W3C forever. And 
still you can participate in an interest group - as long as you don't do 
"real standardization".

One problem is the charter of the ITS IG, see

http://www.w3.org/International/its/ig/ITSIGCharter.html

it is focused on ITS 1.0. So we need a re-charter, I guess ...

- Felix

Am 21.02.13 16:41, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> I think it would make sense to use the ITS one:
>
> In the long run the IG would live longer than the WG.
> And we have already put some ITS 2.0 info there, like the list of the LQI type values and their mapping to various tools.
>
> cheers,
> -ys
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:16 AM
> To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [All] high level use cases doc and wiki link
>
> Am 21.02.13 10:25, schrieb Pablo Nieto Caride:
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>> I think that a good idea!
>>
>> As to what wiki to use, maybe it's better to leave the dead alone :)
> Hi Pablo,
>
> in principle you are right ... but one aspect is that in 2 years, maybe http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Main_Page
> will be dead ... anyway, we should just choose between the two wikis and groups - and rather soon, so that we can have links from the ITS2 and the to be published BP documents.
>
> - Felix
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Pablo.
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am wondering whether we should make our wiki editable by everybody
>> with a W3C account, and have a link from the high level use cases doc
>> at w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl (will be life next week) to a wiki page.
>>
>> Rationale: The usage scenarios will soon be out of date:
>> implementations will evolve, usage scenarios change etc. So having a
>> link from the introduction at w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl to the
>> wiki will allow us to keep info up to date. And if the wiki is public
>> write, we can gather a community around it.
>>
>> If we do that, me may also want to do it for other to be published "BP"
>> documents.
>>
>> Now, one more thought is: should this be the MLW-LT wiki - or should
>> we move to the (these days rarely used) ITS IG wiki?
>>
>> The good thing about the ITS IG wiki
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Main_Page
>> is that everybody can join already. The bad thing is that ... it's "dead".
>> So if we go above route, which wiki to use?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 20:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:08 UTC