W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [All] high level use cases doc and wiki link

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:16:23 +0100
Message-ID: <51263A47.70507@w3.org>
To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Am 21.02.13 10:25, schrieb Pablo Nieto Caride:
> Hi Felix,
>
> I think that a good idea!
>
> As to what wiki to use, maybe it's better to leave the dead alone :)

Hi Pablo,

in principle you are right ... but one aspect is that in 2 years, maybe
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Main_Page
will be dead ... anyway, we should just choose between the two wikis and 
groups - and rather soon, so that we can have links from the ITS2 and 
the to be published BP documents.

- Felix


>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering whether we should make our wiki editable by everybody with a
> W3C account, and have a link from the high level use cases doc at
> w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl (will be life next week) to a wiki page.
>
> Rationale: The usage scenarios will soon be out of date: implementations
> will evolve, usage scenarios change etc. So having a link from the
> introduction at w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl to the wiki will allow us to
> keep info up to date. And if the wiki is public write, we can gather a
> community around it.
>
> If we do that, me may also want to do it for other to be published "BP"
> documents.
>
> Now, one more thought is: should this be the MLW-LT wiki - or should we move
> to the (these days rarely used) ITS IG wiki?
>
> The good thing about the ITS IG wiki
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Main_Page
> is that everybody can join already. The bad thing is that ... it's "dead".
> So if we go above route, which wiki to use?
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 15:16:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:08 UTC