- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:09:34 +0100
- To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5124E72E.8050309@w3.org>
Hi all,
today's call minutes are at
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/20-mlw-lt-minutes.html
and below as text. Summary:
- Dave will make a new poster template for Rome and send it around- all,
please re-work your poster with that.
- Dave has created a logo to highlight relations between posters, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/att-0130/ITS_overview.pptx
all, please use that as part of your poster.
- we discussed posters a bit, see
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/20-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item09
summary: try to be both technical and "business oriented" (what is the
value of xyz?)
- we will have a separate, two hour call to rehersal Luxembourg (15
march), see
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/20-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item04
Please fill in the following doodle poll to find a call time.
http://www.doodle.com/2uizhdqmbmw6qwa9
Best,
Felix
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
MLW-LT WG
20 Feb 2013
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0114.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/20-mlw-lt-irc
Attendees
Present
felix, Karl, Marcis, DomJones, Yves, Des, Arle, dF,
shaunm, renatb, nieves, swalter, Ankit, DaveLewis,
pnietoca, philr, Jirka, Naoto, leroy, Declan,
omstefanov, mdelolmo
Regrets
christian
Chair
felix
Scribe
daveL
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]rome setup
2. [6]luxembourg prep
3. [7]who will go to lux
4. [8]poster template
5. [9]rehersal for review
6. [10]review posters
7. [11]technical progress
* [12]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
rome setup
<Jirka>
[13]http://www.multilingualweb.eu/en/documents/rome-workshop/ro
me-program
[13] http://www.multilingualweb.eu/en/documents/rome-workshop/rome-program
<fsasaki> [14]http://www.multilingualweb.eu/rome-showcase
[14] http://www.multilingualweb.eu/rome-showcase
felix: showcase is titles of WG poster
... asks everyone to check that these titles are correct
... the google doc has logistic details, please check these are
correct
<fsasaki> "HTML-to-TMS Roundtrip using XLIFF with CMS-LION and
SOLAS TCD/UL" > "HTML-to-TMS Roundtrip using XLIFF with
CMS-LION and SOLAS UL/TCD"
dave; change poster session from 'TCD/UL' to 'UL/TCD'
<fsasaki> "Simple Segment Machine Translation DCU " > "Simple
Segment Machine Translation DCU/TCD"
<fsasaki> [15]http://www.multilingualweb.eu/rome-showcase
[15] http://www.multilingualweb.eu/rome-showcase
<fsasaki> "Showcase Session presentations will be held in
parallel to the Workshop's general poster session after lunch
on both days (March 12 and 13) of the Workshop as well as
during the afternoon coffee break on Day 1 (March 12) and
morning coffee break on Day 2 (March 13)."
felix: showcases are parallel to session, in the coffee
breaks/lunch breaks
arle: concerns raise that the people in the lunchtime session
that people won't have time to eat
... but people are free to roam
dave: will area be secure
arle: area not secure, so may need to be able to take item away
<fsasaki> dave: make sure that somebody takes an I on things
when others are leaving
dave: could just coordinate to watch over eachother kit
felix: asks nieves to investigate
dave: will there by wifi
felix: yes, confirmed
arle: each person need to bring thier own poster, but we will
provide mounting materials
felix: asks should all posters be laminated
arle: would recommend not to laminate this as it adds to the
cost, glossy finish would be better
felix: everyone should opt just for glossy finish
luxembourg prep
felix: don't have agenda yet, but have outline from other
project covering management, WP and outreach
... at review we will present a subset of annual report content
and then a demo session
... But doW WP are often orthogonal to actual integraiton and
demo work.
<fsasaki> dave: keep WP1, 2 and 6 separate
<fsasaki> .. they are outside the others
<fsasaki> .. we report on integration work in the form we
demonstrate them
<fsasaki> dave: make sure that you report on deliverable
progress - you can do that in the mgmt intro
<Declan> agree not to follow strict WP-based presentations.
From previous project reviews, this has worked quite well
felix: aim to make the review as engaging as possible
... use as much as possible to bring posters form Rome to
review
declan; probably won't have time to present them, but a
selection may be useful for reference
felix: agreed
felix, we are having trouble hearing you
<pnietoca> Seems like Felix is having problems with his audio
declan: shall we agree who should present
who will go to lux
<fsasaki> daveL: arrange a rehersal session, even if virtual
<kfritsche> Clemens
<Yves_> ENLASO: Yves
<fsasaki> felix to lux
felix: please could everyone provide the name of the people
from you organsiation who will go
<philr> philr will represent VistaTEC at Luxembourg
<dF> UL: Reinhard
<fsasaki> DFKI: Arle, Felix
<kfritsche> Cocomore: Clemens probably also H.v.F
TCd: Dave
<pnietoca> Linguaserve: Pedro will attend to Luxembourg
<swalter> Hans, I thiink so, too...
<Declan> DCU: Ankit probably also Declan
<Jirka> No, I can't attend Lux
Felix: jirka unable to attend
... as demo, better to have industry showcases
<fsasaki> Cocomore, Linguaserve, VistaTEC
<fsasaki> daveL: hard to demonstrate everything
<fsasaki> .. good to have yves
<fsasaki> .. ENLASO
felix: so then: cocomore, vistatec, linguasaseve (with MT)
<pnietoca> Pedro has in mind to show a demo
<Declan> (Once there is a preliminary list of attendees - it
may be worth checking with Kimmo as to who he expects/wishes to
attend to ensure we have the desired representation)
<pnietoca> for both WP3 and WP4
felix: subcontractors are not obliged to come, but can if they
want
des: unable to attend
horst; sebastian may be able to attend from init
<omstefanov> what are the date(s) for Luxembourg?
<Yves_> March-15
felix; confirms clemens could demo for cocomore
felix: bout UL/DCU/TCD
<fsasaki> dave: could merge things from DCU/TCD, I can demo,
ankit and declan can say more about the MT side
<Ankit> agreed
declan; agrees that a condensed version of TCD/DCU/UL
<fsasaki> ACTION: daveL to make slide tempalte for review
[recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2013/02/20-mlw-lt-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-450 - Make slide tempalte for review
[on David Lewis - due 2013-02-27].
poster template
<fsasaki> see
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0130.html attachment
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0130.html
des: do we need to use the uptodate template
felix: please use the new temaplte
... we need to have a rehersal
rehersal for review
<fsasaki> daveL: thursday morning, 14 March, in rome?
<Marcis> The template had a low-res logo of EU and MLW-LT
<Marcis> will these be updated
<Marcis> ?
<fsasaki> felix: will do a doodle for a 2 hour call
review posters
<fsasaki> phil: key, legend, context or map would be good
<fsasaki> .. woudl be useful for the review too
<philr> Yeah, as a slide transition
<fsasaki> .. at the review we show all the differetn views
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/0130.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0130.html
<kfritsche>
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/att-0130/TCD-cmis-prov2.pdf
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/att-0130/TCD-cmis-prov2.pdf
<fsasaki>
[20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-
lt/2013Feb/att-0130/ITS_overview.pptx
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/att-0130/ITS_overview.pptx
<fsasaki> felix: above pptx is what dave proposed to re-use
across posters
<omstefanov> DaveL do you think the fonts can be bigger,
especially the red ones for the arc arrows
<philr> yes
felix; everyone should do update to poster by the 27th Feb
<Yves_> can you paste the link to the posters again. thanks.
poster1 is missing outline, new temaplte should fix this
same for poster 2, use new outline
<fsasaki> dave: about font size
<fsasaki> .. font size is different
<fsasaki> .. e.g. poster 2 has a bigger font size compared to
poster 1
<philr> I had based my font sizes on posters from CNGL which
worked well
<omstefanov> davL - I'm willing to try to rework the arc
powerpoint and send it to you
<fsasaki> daveL: useful to look at yves' and jirkas , p1 and p2
<fsasaki> .. both are technical which is good
<omstefanov> the important part about larger fonts is for those
posters that will be used as slides. Posters in and of
themselves, if not used as slides can have smaller fonts
<fsasaki> .. but also add: who would benefit, who has an easier
life from this?
<fsasaki> .. add that to make things clearer for people coming
from a user perspective
<omstefanov> viewers of slides develop negative opinions of
slides that have fonts that can't be seen.
<fsasaki> davel: most people have been to MLW ws
<fsasaki> .. great thing is that they have a mix of
stakeholdres
technical progress
felix: technical progress on last call has been slowed by rome
preparation
... david will review issue list and look to see if there are
new action points needed or followed up on
... so look for mails form co-chair
... Can't predict exactly when we will finish last call stage,
but probably in April, a month later than planned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: daveL to make slide tempalte for review [recorded
in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2013/02/20-mlw-lt-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version
1.137 ([23]CVS log)
$Date: 2013-02-20 14:45:05 $
[22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:10:04 UTC