Re: action-221 summary of overriding discussion

On 20.9.2012 19:04, Felix Sasaki wrote:

> My proposal would be that we do not change overriding behavior at all. From
> 6), it seems that the tool specific information does not have a need for
> selection at all, so no need for local markup, global rules, inheritance or
> defaults. It is sufficient to express: "Then processing data category X,
> the ITS aware processor MUST pass the information given about tooling to
> the application".
> So we could define a description of tooling information, based in
> Christian's proposal, and say each description MUST make clear what data
> category it relates to. The effect would be:

Hi Felix,

could you please point us the concrete example how this should look like
when stored inside XML document with other ITS markup? I'm unable to
find Christian's proposal you are refering to.

Thanks,

     Jirka
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------