- From: Karl Fritsche <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:03:52 +0100
- To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi all, only want to point out a minor issue with the HTML+RDFa Example (Example 55) in disambiguation. - the <link>-tag to the its rules are missing - is the ITS-prefix in the <body> needed? - I think the property should be http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name, because the default RDFa NS (http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#) has no name property and another @vocab is not defined - in my mind in this example resource should be replaced with about, because dbpedia:Dublin is the subject? Cheers, Karl On 18.10.2012 15:31, Tadej Štajner wrote: > Hi Yves, > > On 18. 10. 2012 15:08, Yves Savourel wrote: >> Hi Tadej, all, >> >> Currently we have: in the global section of disambiguation: >> >> - Using disambigSource and disambigIdent to specify the collection >> and the identifier itself. >> - Using one of disambigIdentRef, disambigIdentPointer or >> disambigIdentRefPointer using a URI for the disambiguation target. >> >> It seems it should be: >> >> - Using disambigSource and one of disambigIdent or >> disambigIdentPointer to specify the collection and the identifier >> itself. >> - Using one of disambigIdentRef or disambigIdentRefPointer using a >> URI for the disambiguation target. > I declared disambigIdentPointer since I was going from the ITS1.0 > patterns, where this was intended to cover the case where one would > declare the entity within the same document. I don't expect this style > to be used often. Initially, didn't spot this ambiguity and the > resulting side effects when we also allow a non-URI identifier. I > would say that the second version makes more sense. > >> Sorry, I'm being slow and having a bit of a hard time to understand >> what combinations of attribute are allowed. My understanding so far >> was that you could have: >> >> - class (and possibly granularity) >> - and either source+ident or identRef > > Type class and granularity are optional. The mutual exclusivity only > applies with the addressing modes (source + ident* vs. identRef*). > Your example below is correct - the rules should say that one must use > one of these two possibilities. > > -- Tadej > >> >> But the example 53 should a case with no class. >> >> The way the global attributes are defined currently is such that the >> disambiguation rule could have just the selector :) >> >> Are the possibilities: >> >> - Either source + ident (+ optionally claas) (+ optionally granularity) >> - Or just identRef (+ optionally claas) (+ optionally granularity) >> >> Or some other combinations? >> >> Thanks, >> -yves >> >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 18:05:10 UTC