Re: AW: [all] revision to disambiguation text

Hi Yves, all,

This statement
"Using disambigSource and one of disambigIdent or disambigIdentPointer to
specify the collection and the identifier itself."
still contradicts this one
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#basic-concepts-addingpointing
"The functionalities of adding information and pointing to existing
information are mutually exclusive."
Since with the current definition of Disambugiation, disambigSource and
disambigIdentPointer could appear together.

Could we not just drop "adding information" functionality from
Disambugation? Tadej, all: which tool would produce or consume such examples
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-disambiguation-global-1
with pointers to individual elements?

Yves agreed at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0274.html
that such usage doesn't make sense for localization issue - we probably
should change the example. How about disambiguation?

Best,

Felix


2012/10/27 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>

> Hi Tadej, all
>
> I've updated the disambiguation section:
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#Disambiguation
> Would you mind reading it to make sure it's ok now? Thanks.
>
> Jirka: I think I've modified the .xpr file inadvertently.
>
> Cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow