Re: Sections for HTML local implementation?

True indeed - well, from this thread it probably follows that I won't get
an action item (and Dave won't too ;) ) while we are at localization world
to change the spec - sounds good too :)

Felix

2012/10/10 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>

> FWIW:
>
> I agree with Jirka.
>
> Note that even if the user is dealing only with HTML documents s/he may
> have to work with the XML syntax anyway (linked rules).
>
> -ys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:49 AM
> To: Dave Lewis
> Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Sections for HTML local implementation?
>
> On 10.10.2012 16:09, Dave Lewis wrote:
>
> > Would that work? We'd still need to look at the section 1-5 to make
> > sure that it doesn't favour XML over HTML, e.g. we have section 1.4
> > calling out usage in HTML5 while the usage in XML is more implicit,
> > also the examples in this earlier section are still largely XML rather
> than HTML.
>
> Personally I think it is perfectly OK to favour XML over HTML in spec as
> long as spec provides clear definition on how to use ITS in HTML5. Given
> HTML limitations some things are complicated and sort of hack in HTML, so
> we don't have to pretend that HTML provides same support for ITS as XML.
>
>                                 Jirka
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>        Professional XML consulting and training services
>   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow