RE: [All] testing - reminder (due TODAY) and "how to": please fill in testing table

Thank you, Tatiana, all, that sounds indeed like a good use of global
rules. Maybe your team wants to create an example for that? That's always
easier to explain to "outsiders".

Best,

Felix
Am 05.10.2012 15:58 schrieb "Tatiana Gornostay" <tatiana.gornostay@tilde.lv
>:

> Sorry, forgot to forward my colleague’s comment:****
>
> ** **
>
> In a machine term annotation process, the global rules are actually not
> necessary. All annotation can be embedded into local tags, which is much
> more productive and easier for systems to read and understand than multiple
> layers of global rules. However, we could use global rules for automated
> processes to understand whether specific mark-up is existing in the
> documents and use that in order to, for instance, not re-annotate something
> or not to create overlapping term annotations. (Mārcis Pinnis)****
>
> ** **
>
> Any feedback/suggestions/comments are welcome!****
>
> ** **
>
> Have a nice weekend,****
>
> Tatiana****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Tatiana Gornostay [mailto:tatiana.gornostay@tilde.lv]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 4:54 PM
> *To:* Felix Sasaki; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Subject:* RE: [All] testing - reminder (due TODAY) and "how to": please
> fill in testing table****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear Felix, Dear All,****
>
> ** **
>
> It’s done for Tilde terminology use case.****
>
> ** **
>
> With best wishes,****
>
> Tatiana****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 10:12 AM
> *To:* public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Subject:* [All] testing - reminder (due TODAY) and "how to": please fill
> in testing table****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear all,****
>
> ** **
>
> this is a reminder to fill in the test suite table at****
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgIk0-aoSKOadG5HQmJDT2EybWVvVC1VbnF5alN2S3c#gid=0
> ****
>
> by today.****
>
> ** **
>
> Also, a clarification: ITS 2.0 has conformance statements: if you
> implement a data category, you must do it****
>
> 1) globally or locally, in each case taking overriding, inheritance and
> defaults into account (if applicable)****
>
> 2} in HTML or XML****
>
> ** **
>
> Combinations of 1) and 2) are fine too, e.g. HTML locally, XML globally.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Now, how does this relate to the test suite?****
>
> If you implement a data category globally, just MUST do testing for all
> tests that are available for global (for XML or HTML or both - that's your
> choice). An example: for nearly all data categories you have global
> embedded or linked rules, at least for XML. It is not possible to do cherry
> picking, that is do only embedded or linked rules testing.****
>
> ** **
>
> Why is that? See this from the point of view of a user: if you claim
> conformance to implement a data category, globally, the user wants to see
> if you implement all aspects of global.****
>
> ** **
>
> Above explanation is specific to global, but the same is true if you
> implement something locally.****
>
> ** **
>
> I hope that this clarifies things - let me know otherwise. Please be
> prepared for a sanity check of the test suite current state on Monday.****
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
> ** **
>
> Felix ****
>
>
>
> --
> Felix Sasaki****
>
> DFKI / W3C Fellow****
>
> ** **
>