Re: Provenance issue

Changed after offline discussion with Jirka, see
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#provenance-definition

- Felix

Am 27.11.12 12:17, schrieb Felix Sasaki:
> And now also to the list ...
>
> - Felix
>
> Am 27.11.12 12:16, schrieb Felix Sasaki:
>> Hi Jirka,
>>
>> my bad. Do you want to change the attribute list, e.g.
>> "A personPointer or personRefPointer attribute that implement the
>> human provenance information."
>> to
>> "A personPointer or personRefPointer attribute that contains a
>> relative selector pointing to a node that implements the human
>> provenance information."
>>
>> I think that should fix this?
>>
>> - Felix
>>
>> Am 27.11.12 12:07, schrieb Jirka Kosek:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm just trying to implement provenance into schema. There seems to be
>>> some incosistencies in definition.
>>>
>>> All attributes on provRule element are defined as
>>>
>>> "A string or an IRI (only for the Ref attributes)"
>>>
>>> But as all of such attributes are ending woitj ...Pointer they should
>>> have *relative selector* type. Am I right?
>>>
>>>                 Jirka
>>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 12:38:11 UTC