W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > November 2012

Localization Quality Précis

From: Fredrik Liden <fliden@enlaso.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:27:52 -0700
To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <assp.0667456a34.4236658BB877A542A66660614300B18580131F32DD@orion.helios.local>
Btw, in Lyon someone suggested changing the name from locQualityPrécis. I was curious if we settled on Précis or not. Sorry if I missed any decision on this.
       
I'm not sure if it has a different meaning in French but in English dictionaries it seems to indicate a textual summary, brief, recap of texts, points, ideas.
By these definitions I'm not sure we're using it in the right context. 

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/precis

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pr%C3%A9cis

	
Seems the suggested LocQualityScore would be more descriptive but now sure how to distinguish that from the Vote. Considering Vote and Score are mutually exclusive now, it's almost as if Vote should just be an optional flag to further indicating how the score was determined (although it could be redundant with the profile). The flag could be:

1. Default, (no flag = no Vote) based on some concrete criteria such as number of QA issues. 
2. Default (or Vote), by one QA person. Is it a score or a vote of 1 person?
3. A vote by multiple people. But what does this exactly mean for the implementation.

Looking at 1 and 3 though, you might just want to have both Score and Vote at the same time. A Score determined by a concrete scoring profile. And a Vote based on another profile, partly subjective.

Just some thoughts, I'm probably missing something.

Cheers,
Fredrik


-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Savourel 
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 7:16 AM
To: public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org
Subject: Re: M1 - Nov-15

Hi Phil,

> Also, is there anything still gating the Quality related tests?
> Phil.

The Localization Quality Issue should be stable now, just waiting for approval to remove all the pointers minus one from the global rule.
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0103.html


The Localization Quality Précis however seems to be needing attention.
Mostly to decide if the global rule needs changes.
See https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/295


cheers,
-yves



Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 19:28:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC