W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > November 2012

Re: [ACTION-256]: Compile and circulate itsTool examples togehter with proposal text

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:08:56 +0100
Message-ID: <509A5D68.30301@kosek.cz>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
On 7.11.2012 13:54, Felix Sasaki wrote:

> That means that we require the "end" of the URI to be XML. I would oppose
> to that. Either we say "anything can be on the other end of the URI", or
> we speciy what is here. About the Linguaserve case: as Jirka noted, we can
> leave that use case implementation defined - it would simplify a lot about
> the HTML processing.

Indeed. Just to make it crystal clear. URL approach would mean that
instead of pointing to structure like:

<its:toolInfo xml:id="T2" dataCategory="MTConfidence">

which can be in the same file or in external file, you would encode
everything into single URL:


URL "http://mymt.org/toolinfo?version=456&value=FR-to-EN-General" is not
meant to be dereferenced. There will be no resource at this URL it is
just way how to encode all necessary data into one string.

Such approach is not uncommon. For example XQuery/XSLT uses this for
defining collations where each implementations provides differents
parameters for initializing collation.


  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 13:09:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:08:24 UTC