W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:48:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL58czqz7=_D4GKVz=PggnFqBckXp1FcUEus4UH62uebestLww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Hi Jirka,

2012/6/18 Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>

> On 18.6.2012 3:09, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
> > I am sure I forgot *a lot*, but we want to get a first draft out soon, so
> > this should be a basis. By Thursday, please reply *to this thread* and
> > - Let me know what to change
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> I think that we should take different approach for HTML5 attributes. I
> have not good idea yet, let me think about it for a while.
>

OK.


>
> I think that main body of spec should define data categories in a
> neutral way and define schema fragments for XML serialization of ITS.
>
> I think that it would be better to have HTML5 attribute implementation
> described in one separate section -- this way people interested in using
> ITS only with XML content will not be bothered with strange HTML5 sort
> of duplicated attributes.
>
> Also it probably doesn't make sense to have schema for HTML5 attributes
> in spec as HTML5 spec itself doesn't have schema at all. But of course
> we should provide this schema for easy plugging into validator.nu.
>
> I'm not sure if there is time before Thursday to reorganize text in this
> way, at least we should use the right convention for converting
> camel-case in names of HTML5 attributes.



Thanks for the reminder  - just changed this.

I also created a section including examples
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#usage-in-html5
and
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#selection-global-html5
please have a look.



> For example instead of
>
> [26]    att.local.html5.attribute.its-locNote    ::=     attribute
> its-locNote
> { string }?
>
> we should have
>
> [26]    att.local.html5.attribute.its-locNote    ::=     attribute
> its-loc-note { string }?
>
> HTML5 parsing normalizes attribute names to lower-case so it doesn't
> make sense to use upper-case letters in spec. It will lead only to
> confusion when someone will be looking for attribute names with
> upper-case letters in name inside DOM.
>
> Felix, thanks for kicking this out.
>


Thanks for having a look at it :)

Felix


>
>                                Jirka
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Professional XML consulting and training services
>  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 03:48:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:24:56 UTC