Re: [all] call for concensus on Translation Provenance Agent (related to ISSUE-22)

Hi Dave, all,

About

"Two types of Translation Provenance Agent data categories are needed to
identify:"

and the data category in general: wouldn't it be possible to have just two
attributes "agent" and "agentRef", and an additional one "type" with the
values "transAgent" or "revisionAgent"? In that they there are less
attributes and also less pointer attributes (see Yves' comment). It would
look like this I think:

<its:agentRule selector="/html/body/par" its:agentRef="
http://www.onlinemtexample.com/2012/7/25/legal-v1/wsdl/"  type="transAgent"
/>


<its:agentRule selector="/html/body/par" agent="John Doe, acme-CAT-v2.3"
type="revisionAgent"/>



Small editorial thing: your examples above said "its:domainRule", I changed
that to "agentRule".


Another note: in ITS global rules, we always used attributes without a
namespace, e.g. "agents" instead of "its:agents".



Felix



2012/7/25 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>

> Hi all,
> Given the implementation commitment to provenance and the previous posting
> on this subject, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**
> Public/public-multilingualweb-**lt/2012Jun/0161.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0161.html>please find attached the proposed specification for the Translation
> Provenance Agent plus the example files.
>
> As a reminder, and as discussed in the original post and mentioned at the
> last WG call, provenance covers two essentially independent approaches:
> agent provenance, (which is this one), and standoff provenance, which we
> are treating as two individual data categories. I will send on the standoff
> provenance call for concensus shortly.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow