W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [all] Values for Disambiguation Granularity

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:37:40 +0100
Message-ID: <50BCAB24.1090609@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Am 03.12.12 14:33, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>> We can't change HTML handling of these values. But we could
>> require producers of these values to be lower case, that is:
>> ontology-concept
>> lexical-concept
>> would this solve the problem? I checked
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/schemas/its20-types.rng
>> it seems (see the "value" elements in the schema file) that ontologyConcept and
>> lexicalEntity are the only values that would need to be changed.
> There are also all the data category identifiers used in annotatorsRef I suppose.

Correct. These are all lower cased, see the table at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#datacategories-overview

>
> >From an implementation viewpoint it is not a big deal to treat HTML and XML differently I was mostly thinking about the test suite. There is a MUST in that paragraph, so we should have tests to validate all cases where this occurs.
>
> Keeping things as it is now is OK (a bit annoying, but OK) in my implementer opinion.

I think we could easily decide about this during the call today. That 
is, saying: we will publish the LC draft this the change
lexicalConcept > lexical-concept
ontologyConcept >ontologyConcept
I will add that to the agenda for today.

This change is minor, so we could vote for LC publication without an 
addition review.

Best,

Felix
> Leroy and Dom may have a different view.
>
> -ys
>
>
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 13:38:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC