W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [All] its-tool-ref vs. its-tools-ref

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:52:17 +0100
Message-ID: <50BB7931.2000805@w3.org>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Thanks, Jörg and Yves. I uploaded a new version of the edits, including 
Yves' suggestions, to

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/File:Its20-annotation-edits.docx

I will not put this into the draf yet put will put it onto the agenda 
for tomorrow. We then hopefully can go to "last call" saying: including 
the edits at

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/File:Its20-annotation-edits.docx

Best,

Felix

Am 02.12.12 16:48, schrieb Jörg Schütz:
> Hi folks,
> With these ammendments, now everything sounds pretty much correct and 
> reasonable.
> Cheers -- Jörg
>
> On Dec 02, 2012 at 16:15 (UTC+1), Yves Savourel wrote:
>> Hi Felix, Phil, Dave, all,
>>
>>> 1) sometimes you want to provide tool information just
>>> about the textual data
>>> 2) sometimes you want to provide tool information
>>> about the textual data + annotations
>>> 3) sometimes you want to provide tool information
>>> about just annotations
>>
>> So this is case 1):
>>
>> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp'
>>        its:provToolRef='myMTiri'
>>        >text</span>
>>
>>
>> This is case 1) and case 2) at the same time:
>> (with the fudging that myMTuri is not really doing the annotation, 
>> but provides the information being carried by the annotation (the 
>> confidence score))
>>
>> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp'
>>        its:provToolRef='myMTiri'
>>        its:mtConfidence='0.8'
>> its:annotatorsRef='mt-confidence|myMTiri'>text</span>
>>
>>
>> I assume this is case 2) and case 3), but case 1) is not done here:
>>
>> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp'
>>        its:mtConfidence='0.8'
>>        its:annotatorsRef='provenance|SomeToolIri 
>> mt-confidence|myMTiri'>text</span>
>>
>>
>> I assume this is case 1), 2) and 3) at the same time:
>>
>> <span its:provOrg='xyz-corp'
>>        its:provToolRef='myMTiri'
>>        its:mtConfidence='0.8'
>>        its:annotatorsRef='provenance|SomeToolIri 
>> mt-confidence|myMTiri'>text</span>
>>
>> The fact that in these two last cases the two IRIs of annotatorsRef 
>> points to different things (one is the tool that added the markup, 
>> the other is the tool that provided the info to carry in the markup) 
>> is still bothering me a bit. But I suppose if it's explained in the 
>> ITS Tool Annotation section (and the Provenance section) it's OK.
>>
>> The added text seems ok.
>>
>> Typos/notes:
>>
>> -- "...only meant to be used then actual ITS annotation is involved" 
>> should be "...only meant to be used ***when*** actual ITS annotation 
>> is involved"
>>
>> -- "Example 27: Example of ITS Tool Annotation" maybe: "Example 27: 
>> Example of ITS Tools Annotation"?
>>
>> cheers,
>> -yves
>>
>
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 15:52:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC