Re: Missing action items

Thanks Pedro,

Based on this, would you consider this resolved? I just didn't find an (apparent) connection to a metadata item, but if we resolved it from the other item, then I think we are OK.

-Arle


Sic scripsit Pedro L. Díez Orzas in Apr 12, 2012 ad 14:40 :

> Dear Arle,
>  
> About the action item you mention, I sent the 20th March the following to start the discussion. I do not know if with this we close this action and where is now the requierement “Support annotation of grouping of CMS documents or CCMS components”.
>  
> Best,
> Pedro
> De: Pedro L. Díez Orzas [mailto:pedro.diez@linguaserve.com] 
> Enviado el: martes, 20 de marzo de 2012 12:31
> Para: 'member-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org'
> Asunto: [ACTION-11]: Start discussion on "Annotate structure of the source web content for web structural text units identification" requirement
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> [ACTION-11]: Start discussion on "Annotate structure of the source web content for web structural text units identification" requirement
>  
> Discussion:
>  
> The "Annotate structure of the source web content for web structural text units identification" requirement is thought to consider the structure of sections or components of the web page when it is already produced and published (HTML) by the web browser.
>  
> Regarding translation of a Real Time Translation and Publication system, it might be necessary to indicate the text unit or “web section” that needs to be treated, and this unit can be only one component or a group. This information can be used for identifying every text unit to be translated or for caching each web section instead the whole web page or to proceed in a localization chain with each of the text units together.
>  
> But, if we consider the requirement “3.10 Support annotation of grouping of CMS documents or CCMS components” as not only for CMS or CCMS components, but also for web page components or “web sections” we could think that the requirement 3.5 can be included in the 3.10.
>  
> If this is the case, my proposal is to include 3.5 under 3.10.
>  
> Best,
> Pedro
>  
>  
> __________________________________
>  
> Pedro L. Díez Orzas
> Presidente Ejecutivo/CEO
> Linguaserve Internacionalización de Servicios, S.A.
> Tel.: +34 91 761 64 60
> Fax: +34 91 542 89 28
> E-mail: pedro.diez@linguaserve.com
> www.linguaserve.com
>  
> «En cumplimiento con lo previsto con los artículos 21 y 22 de la Ley 34/2002, de 11 de julio, de Servicios de la Sociedad de Información y Comercio Electrónico, le informamos que procederemos al archivo y tratamiento de sus datos exclusivamente con fines de promoción de los productos y servicios ofrecidos por LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. En caso de que Vdes. no deseen que procedamos al archivo y tratamiento de los datos proporcionados, o no deseen recibir comunicaciones comerciales sobre los productos y servicios ofrecidos, comuníquenoslo a clients@linguaserve.com, y su petición será inmediatamente cumplida.»
>  
> "According to the provisions set forth in articles 21 and 22 of Law 34/2002 of July 11 regarding Information Society and eCommerce Services, we will store and use your personal data with the sole purpose of marketing the products and services offered by LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. If you do not wish your personal data to be stored and handled, or you do not wish to receive further information regarding products and services offered by our company, please e-mail us to clients@linguaserve.com. Your request will be processed immediately."
>  ____________________________________
>  
>  
> De: Arle Lommel [mailto:arle.lommel@gmail.com] 
> Enviado el: miércoles, 11 de abril de 2012 14:56
> Para: Multilingual Web LT Public List
> Asunto: Missing action items
>  
> In going through our meeting minutes to assign categories to people, I ran into three items from the face-to-face that do not seem to correlate to anything currently in the drafts. Could the people indicated as responsible get back to me and let me know if these map to something in the draft or if we need to add something?
>  
> Pedro to start discussion on "Annotate structure of the source web content for web structural text units identification" requirement
> Ryan to elaborate on need to priority tagging of source content 
> fsasaki to elaborate support annotation of grouping of CMS documents or CCMS components
>  
> As I do not recall any specific details of these items and the minutes are somewhat vague, I want to make sure we are not missing anything.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Arle