- From: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:18 +0200
- To: "dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Dave, your proposal sounds good. I've proposed elsewhere in a few cases to use the same numerical data model since there are often multiple tiered data models used for these sorts of things. Only by using a numerical equivalence can we hope to support blind mapping between them, although the complexities of such mapping (e.g., how to deal with a score of 0.5 if your relevant score points are 0.33... and 0.66...) are not obvious. But in general, for anything where there is not an obvious set of allowable values, I think it makes sense to consistently use that numerical scale. Arle -- Arle Lommel Phone (U.S.): +1.707.709.8650 Skype: arle_lommel LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arlelommel On Apr 3, 2012, at 13:49, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > Hi all, > > To try and keep this issue specific to the technologies concerned, I've > added a separate comment to the 'text analysis annotation' requirement > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements#text_analysis_annotation > as this would seem to be the relevant data category currently. > > There is already an explicit data category requirement related to > confidence score for MT > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements#mt_confidence_score > > I added to this to include a discussion of the data model, suggesting it > be a numeric value between 0.0 and 1.0. > > I will close this action. > Dave > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 12:11:53 UTC