W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: MLWLT-ISSUE-81 (Re: I18N-ISSUE-207: Term data category and dfn element [.prep-ITS-20])

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:33:02 +0100
Message-ID: <51CB17BE.5030901@w3.org>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: Internationalization Working Group <www-international@w3.org>, "public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org>
The paragraph

[
There are also some HTML markup elements that have or can have similar, 
but not necessarily identical, roles and behaviors as certain ITS 2.0 
data categories. For example, the HTML dfn element could be used to 
identify a term in the sense of the Terminology data category. However, 
this is not always the case and it depends on the intentions of the HTML 
content author. To accommodate this situation, users of ITS 2.0 are 
encouraged to specify the semantics of existing HTML markup in an ITS 
2.0 context with a dedicated global rules file. For example, a rule can 
be used to define that the HTML dfn has the semantics of ITS term="yes". 
For additional examples, see the XML I18N Best Practices document.
]

at 
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#html5-existing-markup-versus-its

seems to address my concerns for this issue.

Thanks,
RI


On 21/03/2013 08:39, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Hi Richard, all,
>
> for issue house keeping coming back to this.
>
> We had a thread on www-international on this
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/thread#msg44
>
> where it was already discussed that best practices are the place to
> handle this, see e.g.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0054.html
> this was also the working group resolution at the Prague f2f, see
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#action11
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/89
>
> Note that the general relation between ITS and HTML is a separate issue,
> see
> and I will provide some wording for this.
>
> I am sending this mail to check wether you are OK with closing the
> specific comment related to "dfn", that is I18N-ISSUE-207
> (=MLWLT-ISSUE-81).
>
> Thank you for your help in advance,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 14.01.13 20:44, schrieb Internationalization Working Group Issue
> Tracker:
>> I18N-ISSUE-207: Term data category and dfn element [.prep-ITS-20]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/207
>>
>> Raised by: Richard Ishida
>> On product: .prep-ITS-20
>>
>> 8.4 Terminology
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#terminology
>>
>> We probably need to consider how the its-term attribute relates to the
>> dfn element, which I believe serves the same function, and describe
>> that in this section.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Richard Ishida, W3C
http://rishida.net/
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 16:33:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 26 June 2013 16:33:37 UTC