Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD

Not entirely. It's already there, but we don't define what the content at the other end of the pointer is. So the suggestion was to add non-normative text about one kind of thing it might be. So no, I'm not talking about introducing anything new.

-Arle

On 2013 Jan 18, at 15:43 , "Lieske, Christian" <christian.lieske@sap.com> wrote:

> Hi Arle,
> 
> If I understand correctly, you are suggesting to introduce its-loc-quality-profile-ref in the spec. Is this understanding correct?
> 
> Cheers,
> Christian
> ________________________________
> From: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@gmail.com>
> To: "public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org> 
> Cc: alan melby <alan.melby@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD
> 
> 
> We could also state that the object pointed to by its-loc-quality-profile-ref (currently undefined) can be a set of ISO/TS-11669-compliant specifications. Since that leaves other options open, it doesn't make any normative change to the specification.
> 
> -Arle
> 
> 
> On 2013 Jan 15, at 12:29 , Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> A few notes on the quality sections:
>> 
>> 
>> 1. There is a minor typo in the listing of quality categories (in part I wrote, no less).
>> 
>> 
>> A professzor azt modta Smithnek, hogy he would hear from his lawyer.
>> 
>> Should read
>> 
>> 
>> A professzor azt mondta Smithnek, hogy he would hear from his lawyer.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 2. Section 8.17.1 should mention that a determination of what issue categories are appropriate for consideration depends on the nature of the project and that for more information on setting project specifications, readers may consult ISO/TS-11669. This reference is non-normative, but it is essential to show that the ITS 2.0 quality model is related to broader standards-based trends in this area. This will also add ISO/TS-11669 to the list of references.
>> 
>> 
>> I will work on the needed text in the next few days and submit it.
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> 
>> Arle
> --1234169369-1608882830-1358257175=:95958
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> 
> <html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:14pt">Allowing for a link to ISO/TS-11669-compliant specifications, leaving other options open, would be a good start, and enough for ITS 2.0.<br><br>AKM<br><br>= = =<br><div><span><br></span></div><div><br></div>  <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 14pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1">  <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Arle Lommel &lt;arle.lommel@gmail.com&gt;<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> "public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org" &lt;public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org&gt; <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> alan melby &lt;alan.melby@gmail.com&gt; <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b>
> Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:55 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD<br> </font> </div> <br>
> <meta http-equiv="x-dns-prefetch-control" content="off"><div id="yiv781717750"><div>We could also state that the object pointed to by its-loc-quality-profile-ref (currently undefined) can be a set of ISO/TS-11669-compliant specifications. Since that leaves other options open, it doesn't make any normative change to the specification.<div><br></div><div>-Arle<br><div>
> 
> 
> </div>
> <br><div><div>On 2013 Jan 15, at 12:29 , Arle Lommel &lt;<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:arle.lommel@dfki.de" target="_blank" href="mailto:arle.lommel@dfki.de">arle.lommel@dfki.de</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="yiv781717750Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>A few notes on the quality sections:</div><div><br></div><div>1. There is a minor typo in the listing of quality categories (in part I wrote, no less).</div><div><br></div><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px;"><span style="font-family:sans-serif;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);">A professzor azt modta Smithnek, hogy he would hear from his lawyer.</span></blockquote><font face="sans-serif"><br></font><div><font face="sans-serif">Should read</font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px;"><div><span
> style="font-family:sans-serif;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);">A professzor azt <b>mondta</b> Smithnek, hogy he would hear from his lawyer.</span></div><div><span style="font-family:sans-serif;background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);"><br></span></div></blockquote><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif">2. Section 8.17.1 should mention that a determination of what issue categories are appropriate for consideration depends on the nature of the project and that for more information on setting project specifications, readers may consult ISO/TS-11669. This reference is non-normative, but it is essential to show that the ITS 2.0 quality model is related to broader standards-based trends in this area. This will also add ISO/TS-11669 to the list of references.</font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif">I will work on the needed text in the next few days and submit
> it.</font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif">Best,</font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif">Arle</font></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div><meta http-equiv="x-dns-prefetch-control" content="on"><br><br> </div> </div>  </div></body></html>
> --1234169369-1608882830-1358257175=:95958--
> 
>

Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 14:45:51 UTC