Fwd: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD

Hi Mikhail,

since you are not subscribed to the comments list, your mail did not 
reach the list. You can subscribe to the list via this link:

mailto:public-multilingualweb-lt-comments-request&#64;w3.org?subject=subscribe  <mailto:public-multilingualweb-lt-comments-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe>


Thanks a lot anyway for the comment. We will discuss it and come back to 
you asap.

Best,

Felix

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: 	[Moderator Action] Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD
Datum: 	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:36:32 +0000
Von: 	Verifika support <support@e-verifika.com>
An: 	public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org 
<public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org>



Hello,

I tried to map all our QA categories to the standard ones.

For most of them it was quite obvious, but I am not sure about the 
inconsistency errors.

Our inconsistency check (like a lot of other tools ones) finds different 
translation for the same source text in one file, across several files 
or file and translation memory.

It seems it should be mapped to category "inconsistency", but the exact 
description of this category is the following:

The text is inconsistent with itself (NB: not for use with terminology 
inconsistency).

Example is also about inconsistency in the same text fragment, but not 
about different translations of the same text.

So, it seems this category should not include our "inconsistency" 
errors, but may be it is result of short description.

Could you clarify the sense of this category?

-- 
Kind regards,

Mikhail Kudinov
Verifika^(TM) Support & Development Team
Palex Languages & Software
Tel: +7 (3822) 53-16-38 | Fax: +7 (3822) 56-27-33
Russia | Tomsk | GMT +7